Trump confronts US government in court battle over seized secrets

An increasingly high-stakes standoff between Donald Trump and federal investigators lands in court Thursday, after days of 

headline-grabbing revelations surrounding highly classified documents seized by the FBI from the former president’s 

Florida home.

Trump’s lawyers are asking that an outside party — a “special master” — be named to reassess the government’s screening of 

sensitive documents to determine if any were “highly personal information” that should be returned or protected by claims 

of privilege.

The federal court has already indicated its “preliminary intent” to agree to the independent review, meaning there is 

little intrigue with respect to the stated purpose of the hearing.

But the request has significantly upped the ante.

Some analysts see the move as an attempt by Team Trump to complicate the probe.

It also prompted a searing disclosure by the Justice Department of the evidence against the Republican former president 

recovered from the search of his Mar-a-Lago residence in south Florida last month.

Government officials said in a filing Tuesday they had evidence of efforts to hide classified documents despite a grand 

jury demand in May that Trump produce records removed from the White House in January 2021.

Some of the files were so sensitive, they noted, that federal agents and Justice Department personnel needed their 

security clearances elevated to even look at the material.

The filing also stated that FBI agents located classified documents in Trump’s desk drawers with his passports.

“The location of the passports is relevant evidence in an investigation of unauthorized retention and mishandling of 

national defense information,” the department said.

The filing provided the most detailed account yet of a year-and-a-half long effort to recover hundreds of classified files 

that were improperly taken to Mar-a-Lago when Trump left office.

And the claim of obstructing the FBI search piles further legal pressure on the former president, who denies all 

wrongdoing.

– ‘Give-and-take’ –

The two sides are expected to wrangle over the scope of the review and whether it will determine if parts of the cache are 

covered by “privilege” that can shield some presidential and attorney-client communications from investigation.

Prosecutors say Trump “has no property interest in any presidential records (including classified records) seized from the 

premises” and that he cannot assert executive privilege against the executive branch itself.

But the real drama could emerge in US District Judge Aileen Cannon’s questioning of the 76-year-old billionaire’s 

attorneys, when she will have the opportunity to quiz them over whether he declassified some of the documents, as he has 

claimed.

Trump’s latest legal filing on Wednesday didn’t address the most damaging aspects of the government’s potential 

obstruction case and did not claim that he declassified the documents while he was in office.

Cannon, a Trump appointee, may also scrutinize the certification that his lawyers delivered to the Justice Department on 

June 3, falsely stating that all files with classified markings had been returned.

Trump appeared to admit in a posting on his online platform Truth Social on Wednesday that he knew sensitive documents 

were contained in boxes at Mar-a-Lago at the time of the FBI’s August 8 search.

His legal team says the raid was unnecessary and occurred in “the midst of the standard give-and-take” between Trump and 

the National Archives about the material he was allowed to take with him.

The Justice Department “gratuitously” made public information including a photograph of classified documents seized from 

the residence, the former president’s lawyers argue.

Guardianng